By Liang Cheng
Introduction
Political changes in Washington, D.C. have long had a dramatic impact on international development agencies, but recent developments surrounding the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) stand out for their severity and speed. In addition to traditional disruptions such as tariffs and government shutdowns, we are witnessing an extraordinary series of executive orders and administrative directives that have upended USAID’s global education programs and, by extension, the hundreds of universities that partner with the agency.
This blog post explores how these policy shifts—ranging from abrupt funding freezes to proposed dismantling of entire federal departments—threaten the longstanding higher education collaborations that form a critical component of USAID’s mission.
- Universities and USAID: A Decades-Long Collaboration
Since its creation in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy, USAID has relied heavily on academic institutions to accomplish its global development objectives. A report by the agency, USAID Higher Education: A Retrospective 1960–2020, highlights how the involvement of universities was integral to its work during the Cold War era and remains essential today (USAID, 2020). Through higher education partnerships, USAID has:
• Strengthened infrastructure (e.g., libraries, laboratories) at universities abroad,
• Boosted workforce readiness through curriculum development and teacher training,
• Supported research on global challenges such as food insecurity, public health crises, and climate change.
Recent estimates show that in 2023 alone, more than 830 higher education institutions abroad received support from USAID, benefiting nearly 95,700 learners and generating over 600 peer-reviewed publications (University World News, 2025). These statistics underscore the pivotal role universities play in advancing American soft power and contributing to sustainable development worldwide. - Trump’s “Stunning Evisceration” of USAID
While tensions over foreign aid are not new, the Trump administration’s recent actions have caught many observers off guard. Among the key developments: - Executive Orders and Funding Freezes
On January 20, a 90-day suspension of federal research grants rattled ongoing academic projects (University World News, 2025). Though partially paused by subsequent legal challenges, the freeze left universities uncertain about future funding. - Leadership Turmoil and Threats to the Department of Education
Simultaneously, President Trump appointed new leadership at the U.S. Department of Education—while also announcing intentions to dismantle the department altogether. Such drastic statements undermined confidence in continued educational support at home and abroad. - Elon Musk and the “Department of Government Efficiency”
In perhaps the most dramatic twist, the billionaire Elon Musk was tapped to lead a new “Department of Government Efficiency,” quickly targeting USAID as a so-called “criminal organisation.” Hundreds of contracts were abruptly halted, with thousands of employees laid off or furloughed (The New York Times, 2025).
By Thursday of that same week, The New York Times reported that USAID’s workforce would be slashed from roughly 14,000 to fewer than 300 positions. Following widespread public outcry and legal action, a federal judge put a temporary hold on further furloughs (University World News, 2025). But many contracts and grants remain in jeopardy. - Parallel Pressures: Tariffs and Shutdowns
In the midst of these extraordinary maneuvers, two familiar tools of U.S. policy—tariffs and government shutdowns—continue to loom:
• Tariffs can draw national attention and funds toward trade imbalances or domestic industries. This reduces the political appetite for foreign aid and can directly limit funding available for global education initiatives (Congressional Research Service, 2023).
• Government Shutdowns have a profound operational impact, leading to furloughed personnel, delayed grant disbursements, and stalled communication channels between USAID’s Washington offices and field staff. Projects that require timely oversight—particularly in education—are especially vulnerable (Cheng & McLay, 2024). - The Vulnerability of Higher Education Initiatives
When USAID programs pause or collapse, academic institutions engaged in long-term projects are often left in limbo. Some of the most immediate effects include: - Disrupted Capacity Building
University-based programs are often multi-year efforts involving faculty development, infrastructure support, and policy guidance. A sudden funding freeze or contract termination can erase years of progress. - Risks to Marginalized Groups
Many higher education projects target historically underserved populations—refugees, women, and youth in conflict zones—who need stable educational frameworks. Any break in the continuum of aid disproportionately affects these vulnerable communities. - Mounting Tensions and Uncertainty
With the shutdown of USAID offices and staff furloughs, communication between partners is strained. Institutions involved in research consortia, such as those focusing on the Global Food Security Strategy (Feed the Future), must grapple with possible budget cuts and defunct contracts (USAID, 2022).
Universities have traditionally provided the “soft power” element of U.S. foreign policy, serving as conduits for cultural exchange and the promotion of democracy, human rights, and free-market values (USAID, 2020). Undermining these programs has the unintended consequence of ceding influence to other global actors and eroding trust in U.S. commitments abroad. - Ideological Debates and the Heritage Foundation Report
USAID’s critics—conservative think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation—have long questioned the efficiency and ideological slant of American foreign aid. In a report titled Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, the Foundation describes USAID as “wasteful,” “politicized,” and “self-serving” (Heritage Foundation, 2023). The report also criticizes initiatives related to reproductive health, climate change, and social equity, branding them an unaligned “global platform” for progressive politics.
The Trump administration appears to have embraced much of this criticism, citing a need to “realign” aid with “American values.” Yet, opponents argue that abrupt contract cancellations and workforce dismantling come at the expense of strategic stability—potentially eroding America’s moral and diplomatic standing, while opening the door for geopolitical rivals to exert influence (University World News, 2025). - A Potential Path Forward
Despite the turmoil, there are constructive options for safeguarding the vital role that higher education plays in international development: - Legislative Stabilizers
Lawmakers could enact multi-year funding authorizations or continuing resolutions that protect essential educational collaborations from short-term political swings. Past bipartisan support for global health and education may still provide avenues to secure stable aid budgets. - Public-Private Partnerships and Philanthropy
Diversifying funding sources—through philanthropic foundations, global companies, and non-governmental organizations—can reduce reliance on U.S. federal funds alone (Feed the Future collaborations serve as a blueprint here). - Data-Driven Advocacy
Well-documented case studies and robust impact evaluations can showcase the tangible benefits of educational capacity-building. This evidence-based approach can help policymakers and the public see the long-term returns of investing in higher education abroad (USAID, 2019). - International Networks
Partnerships among universities worldwide can continue through consortia and independent grants, even if certain U.S. government resources are stripped away. This global network might ensure that crucial research and capacity-building efforts do not fully stall.
Conclusion
USAID’s partnerships with universities—once a hallmark of the agency’s ability to deliver sustained development and promote American values—face unprecedented challenges. In the blink of an eye, administrative actions and political upheaval have left these collaborations vulnerable to cancellation, delay, or drastic downscaling. Added stressors such as tariffs and potential government shutdowns only compound the precarious environment.
Yet, universities and their research initiatives remain an essential vehicle for comprehensive, long-term improvement in lower- and middle-income countries around the world. By emphasizing legislative safeguards, diversified funding strategies, and evidence-based advocacy, stakeholders can help ensure these programs endure—and continue contributing to global stability, economic growth, and shared human progress.
References
• Cheng, L., & McLay, R. (2024). Navigating Uncertainty: How US Tariffs and Government Shutdowns Affect USAID and Global Education. [Blog Post].
• Congressional Research Service. (2023). U.S. Foreign Assistance Overview.
• Heritage Foundation. (2023). Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise. Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation.
• The New York Times. (2025). USAID’s Workforce to be Slashed